2021_EPA_NewsRelease_cision.png

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 7 – 11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66219
Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and Nine Tribal Nations

 
EPA Announces First Validated Laboratory Method to Test for PFAS in Wastewater, Surface Water, Groundwater, Soils 

Contact Information: EPA Press Office, [email protected]

LENEXA, KAN. – (Sept. 7, 2021) – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), published a draft of the first EPA-validated laboratory analytical method to test for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in eight different environmental media, including wastewater, surface water, groundwater, and soils. This method provides certainty and consistency and advances PFAS monitoring that is essential to protecting public health.

“This new testing method advances the science and our understanding of PFAS in the environment, so we can better protect people from exposure,” said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. “This illustrates the progress we can make when working with federal partners in an all of government approach. I want to thank the Department of Defense for its leadership on this issue and for working with us to achieve this important milestone.”

A partnership between EPA and the Department of Defense’s Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program has produced draft Method 1633, a single-laboratory validated method to test for 40 PFAS compounds in wastewater, surface water, groundwater, soil, biosolids, sediment, landfill leachate, and fish tissue. Until now, regulated entities and environmental laboratories relied upon modified EPA methods or in-house laboratory standard operating procedures to analyze PFAS in these settings. With the support of the agency’s Council on PFAS, EPA and DoD will continue to collaborate to complete a multi-laboratory validation study of the method in 2022.

“This is one of many examples of strong EPA – DoD Collaboration on issues of national importance. Currently the Department is working with EPA, other federal agencies, academic institutions, and industry on over 130 PFAS-related research efforts, and we expect further progress in the future,” said Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Environment and Energy Resilience Richard Kidd.

This draft method can be used in various applications, including National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. The method will support NPDES implementation by providing a consistent PFAS method that has been tested in a wide variety of wastewaters and contains all the required quality control procedures for a Clean Water Act (CWA) method. While the method is not nationally required for CWA compliance monitoring until EPA has promulgated it through rulemaking, it is recommended now for use in individual permits.

Draft Method 1633 complements existing validated methods to test for PFAS in drinking water and non-potable water.

For more information on CWA Analytical Methods for PFAS, visit:
https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods/cwa-analytical-methods-and-polyfluorinated-alkyl-substances-pfas.

For Frequent Questions about PFAS Methods for NPDES Permits, visit:
https://www.epa.gov/cwa-methods/frequent-questions-about-pfas-methods-npdes-permits

Background:
Draft Method 1633 complements existing Safe Drinking Water Act methods to test for 29 PFAS compounds in drinking water and a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act method for 24 PFAS compounds in non-potable water.

EPA publishes laboratory analytical methods (test procedures) that are used by industries, municipalities, researchers, regulatory authorities and other stakeholders to analyze the chemical, physical, and biological components of wastewater and other environmental samples. EPA regularly publishes methods for CWA compliance monitoring on its CWA Methods website. Doing so does not impose any national requirements to use the method. Only after EPA promulgates a CWA analytical method through rulemaking (at 40 CFR Part 136) does it become nationally required for use in NPDES permit applications and permits.

The work the agency is doing to provide new laboratory analytical methods reflects the work that the EPA Council on PFAS is undertaking to support federal, state, local, and Tribal efforts to protect all communities from the harmful impacts of PFAS contamination.
 

# # #
 
Learn more about EPA Region 7: www.epa.gov/aboutepa/epa-region-7-midwest

2021_EPA_Footer_cision.png
2021_EPA_Twitter_icon_cision.png 2021_EPA_Facebook_icon_cision.png2021_EPA_Instagram_icon_cision.png2021_EPA_LinkedIn_icon_cision.png

 

 

 

 

If you would rather not receive future communications from Environmental Protection Agency, let us know by clicking here.
Environmental Protection Agency, 11201 Renner Blvd., Lenexa, KS 66219 United States

Tags:
[ecwid widgets="productbrowser search categories" default_category_id="CATEGORY_ID" default_product_id="PRODUCT_ID" lang="EN"]

Explore More

Газовый мусоросжигатель

Базовая информация. Экспортные рынки: глобальный Дополнительная информация. Торговая марка: CLOVER. Упаковка: Контейнер Происхождение: Нанкин, Китай Производственная мощность: 1000 комплектов в год описание продукта Как купить инсинератор 1. Nanjing Clover Medical

What are three disadvantages of incinerators?

How much fuel does an incinerator use? Most fuel-assisted incinerators with a capacity to destroy 100 to 150 kilograms of waste per day consume 5 to 8 liters per hour of fuel (4 to 6.5 kilograms of gas)   What are three disadvantages of incinerators? Disadvantages of Waste Incineration     It is Expensive. The installation of an incineration plant is an expensive process. …     Pollutes the Environment. …     Damaging Public Health. …     The Possibility of Long-term Problems. …     Ash Waste Can Potentially Harm People and the Environment. …     Environmental Racism. smart ash incinerator incinerator diesel incinerator south africa package medical waste incinerator   How much does it cost to run an incinerator? Cost of incineration plant by formula According to the formula, the cost of a 40,000 tpa plant is $41 million, or $1,026 per ton of annual capacity. A Medium-sized 250,000 tpa plant should cost $169 million, or $680 per ton of annual capacity. These numbers give us the first estimation of how much waste-to-energy is.   How hot is an incinerator? Thermal destruction of most organic compounds occurs between 590/C and 650/C (1100/F and 1200/F). Most hazardous waste incinerators are operated at 980/C to 1200/C (1800/F to 2200/F) to ensure nearly complete destruction of the organics in the waste (AWMA, 1992). Why incinerators are the most expensive form of waste disposal? Incineration is generally the most expensive form of waste disposal because incin- erators require a lot of energy to operate. Incinerators also need pollution-control devices and need to be carefully monitored so that hazardous gases and particles are not released into the air.       Nanjing Clover Medical

Google快讯 – medical waste

medical waste 实时更新 ⋅ 2021年9月10日 新闻 Post-9/11 Veterans Call for Congressional Action to Cover More Toxic Exposure Illnesses … NBC4 Washington … smoke from burn pits filled with human and